Contrary to popular perception,in History it has always been the Bourgeois who have fueled the famous Revolutions and propelled the lower masses against the rich. The Bourgeois used the poorer classes to further their own ambitions which were being restrained by the upper classes (This is pointed out by Paul Colinvaux in his book The Fates of Nations: A Biological Theory of History). Lenin who spearheaded the Russian Revolution was not a labourer, but a lawyer born to Russian academicians. The Chinese Revolutionary, Mao Zedong,a son of a wealthy farmer was also educated. Similarly the Naxalite movement's 'brain' is derived from among the educated urban Indians, disillusioned with the Indian Bureaucratic setup. This brain is instigating the underprivileged masses who form the 'backbone' of the movement to challenge the diseased Indian bureaucracy.
The movement has now spread virally across vast swathes of India. Stretching from the Nepalese border to Karnataka, they control a bulk of India's forests. They mount frequent attacks on Government establishments in the villages and ambush the convoys passing through 'their' territory. This has crippled the Govt's ability to react to this Red menace. The police are not adequately funded and supported. This problem continually haunts us and has claimed so many lives in the Mumbai attack and also in this case. No one but successive Indian governments are to blame. By turning a blind eye to corruption and neglecting the development of the tribals, they have and are continuing to help justify the Naxalite movement. Salwa Judum and other face-saving initiatives are desperate measures which are not yielding any significant results. At the heart of the problem is the economic disparity between the India seen in the 'India Shining' campaigns and Rural India. But the question remains, are the tribals and peasants better off under the Maoists? Have they achieved even marginal improvement in standards of living?
From an economic perspective, the Industry is unable to tap the potential of these Forests and mineral-rich lands, courtesy the naxals. The Government could use these to further the development of the tribals and lower classes by providing employment and funds.From an international perspective, this comes at a time when India is strongly pushing itself as one of the World's Superpowers and an important player in the South-Asian region.
The Government must adopt a two pronged strategy of (1)adopting a time-bound program for alleviating the poverty and provide the basic needs of the affected masses(2) Step up the pressure by adopting a more hard-line stance and deploying more troops (and if need be, the Armed Forces). This is not the time for haggling whether its a problem of the States or the Centre. Stop passing the baton. Its a question of maintaining Sovereignty. The Central Government should take the pivotal role and co-ordinate with the local governments, and strike down this violent uprising. The Prime minister recently appealed to the Naxalites to drop their guns and approach the problem in a democratic way by contesting the elections. Jokes apart,on a more serious note, will the Naxalites so easily bow down to the very system that they are vehemently opposing? They have to be coerced into submission in order to that. The Naxalites cannot aim to achieve anything phenomenal by opposing India militarily. Its only a matter of time before their movement will collapse. All it takes is the will of the Central Government to act strongly and reclaim the trust that it has to lost among the citizens who form the backbone of the movement. But when will this happen is the question. The real losers ultimately are the peasants and tribals who do not stand to gain anything from this conflict. These are Rebels with a cause, albeit a losing one.